Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jay Clarke vs Maximilian Marterer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Clarke vs Marterer analysis and find out who is favored!
Jay Clarke vs Maximilian Marterer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Clarke 1 - 0 Marterer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Clarke has won 52.79% of points on their second serve, while Marterer has won 49.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Clarke, in recent form, has won 54.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marterer has won 49.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.43% and 24.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Clarke has saved 57.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marterer has saved 56.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Clarke has won 72.06% of matches played (W/L 49/ 19), with Marterer winning 58.82% (W/L 40/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Clarke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 132/ 65), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 10/ 29). Marterer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 69/ 46), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Clarke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.77% of matches (W/L 45/ 16), where as Marterer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.41% of matches (W/L 21/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Clarke winning 1 times and Marterer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Clarke winning 2 and Marterer winning 0. The last match between Clarke and Marterer was at the Biella 5 Challenger, 05-05-2021, Second, Clay with Jay Clarke getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Clarke and Marterer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Clarke winning 0 times and Marterer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Clarke winning 0, and Marterer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Clarke has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.25 while Marterer has played against players with an average rank of 261.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Clarke has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marterer has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Clarke has converted 47.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marterer has converted 39.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
356
Rank
153
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
101
Rank
45
High
28
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
57% (273-203)
Career Total W/L
59% (384-265)
71% (30-12)
YTD W/L
32% (7-15)
$116,120
Career Prize Money
$1,642,050
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jay Clarke | Maximilian Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:1 | 1:44:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (33/68) | 57% (36/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (23/33) | 58% (21/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (18/35) | 41% (11/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (31/63) | 40% (27/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Jay Clarke
Player
Maximilian Marterer
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jay Clarke | Maximilian Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (30/12) | 32% (7/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (66/34) | 38% (20/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (529/424) | 47% (238/273) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (27/9) | 36% (4/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 96 | 98 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:19 | 1:49:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 226.6 | 209.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1785/3008) | 63% (1023/1621) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1182/1785) | 68% (692/1023) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (633/1223) | 49% (296/598) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (182/381) | 40% (44/111) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1407/3127) | 35% (536/1543) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (3/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (27/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (29/40) | 33% (6/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (10/15) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (26/24) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (26/2) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (16/6) | 13% (15/2) |
Jay Clarke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Matias Soto
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Juan Bautista Otegui
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Noa Vukadin
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Jay Clarke
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
97%
(
35 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
50%
(
55 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
74 of
113)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
51%
(
56 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
109
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Omni Kumar
38%
(
12 of
32)
1st Serve %
76%
(
22 of
29)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Juan Bautista Otegui
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Lorenzo Ferri
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maximilian Marterer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Maximilian Marterer
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
22%
(
18 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Maximilian Marterer
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Maximilian Marterer
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Richard Gasquet
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Andrea Picchione
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
38 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(5) 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Maximilian Marterer
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Maximilian Marterer
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Clarke Vs Marterer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jay Clarke
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
